Skip to content

menu

Crowell & Moring LLP logo
HomeAboutOur TeamContact
Search
Close

Health Law

Analysis, commentary, and the latest developments in health care law and policy

Home > Employee Benefits > ‘Use It Or Lose It?’ Not Necessarily… A Closer Look at the Recent IRS Guidance on Flexible Spending Accounts

‘Use It Or Lose It?’ Not Necessarily… A Closer Look at the Recent IRS Guidance on Flexible Spending Accounts

By Crowell & Moring on November 21, 2013
Posted in Employee Benefits, ERISA, Tax

The following article was originally prepared by Crowell & Moring, LLP on behalf of the American Benefits Council.

On October 31, 2013, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) released Notice 2013-71 (Guidance), which modifies the existing “use-it-or-lose-it” rule for health flexible spending accounts (FSAs) set forth in proposed regulations under Section 125 of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) to allow for a limited “carryover.”

Under the Guidance, cafeteria plans under Code Section 125 can be amended to allow up to $500 of unused amounts remaining at the end of a plan year in a health FSA to “carry over” and be paid or reimbursed to plan participants for qualified medical expenses incurred during the following plan year, provided that the plan does not also incorporate the two-month, 15-day “grace period” allowed under current IRS guidance. The carryover of up to $500 does not affect the maximum amount of salary reduction contributions that the participant is permitted to make under Code Section 125(i) (currently $2,500 adjusted for inflation).

The Guidance also provides clarification of transition relief that applies to Code Section 125 plans with non-calendar-year plan years beginning in 2013. The transition relief gives employees participating in such plans expanded flexibility to make changes to their salary reduction elections.

The availability of the carryover rule will provide increased flexibility for employers with respect to plan design and, if adopted, will enable employees to avoid forfeitures of certain unused amounts. Nonetheless, certain issues are left unaddressed by the Guidance, including how the carryover rule could affect an individual’s eligibility to make contributions to a Health Savings Account (HSA), as well as the potential implications of replacing a planned grace period for 2013 with the FSA carryover rule. Employers should carefully consider these issues in deciding whether to adopt the carryover rule for the 2013 plan year (and for 2014 and beyond), or to wait until further guidance is issued.

This Blueprint provides background on the prior rules relating to FSAs, summarizes the new Guidance, and discusses some of the open issues that employers will have to consider.

Please click here to read the full version of this article on Crowell.com. 

Tags: Flexible Spending Account, FSA, Health Savings Account, HSA, IRS, Regulations & Guidance
Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Crowell & Moring Crowell & Moring
Read more about Crowell & Moring
Related Posts
Flurry of Regulatory Activity Driven by COVID-19 Anxiety Impacts Health Plan Requirements and Permissible Actions
March 12, 2020
ACA Repeal and Replace Update: President Trump’s Executive Order Directs Executive Branch to Minimize the Economic Burden of the ACA
January 24, 2017
IRS Denies Tax-Exempt Status to Non-MSSP ACO
April 26, 2016

Subscribe to this blog by email

Blog Authors Show/Hide

  • Josh Abarquez
  • Olivier N. Antoine
  • Gary Baldwin
  • Troy A. Barsky
  • Nicole Benevento
  • Andrew Blasi
  • David Bodenheimer
  • Katie Boyer
  • John Brennan
  • Stephen M. Byers
  • Lorraine M. Campos
  • Arielle Carani
  • Kathy H. Chin
  • Michelle Chipetine
  • Jodi G. Daniel
  • Ellie Dawson
  • Nicholas Diamond
  • Lex Eley
  • Marsena Farris
  • Jurgen Figys
  • Jim Flood
  • Christopher Flynn
  • John Fuson
  • Brandon C. Ge
  • Hadeel Ghaida
  • Denise Giardina
  • Alexis Gilman
  • Edward Goetz
  • Alice Hall-Partyka
  • Stacie Heller
  • Kelly Hightower Hibbert
  • Aileen Hinsch
  • Robert Holleyman
  • Robbie Jost
  • Nkechi Kanu
  • Allison Kwon
  • Eunice Lalanne
  • Warren Lehrenbaum
  • Maida Oringher Lerner
  • Mike Lieberman
  • Tom Lorenzen
  • Stephanie Marcantonio
  • Amanda McDowell
  • Brian McGovern
  • Brian Tully McLaughlin
  • Paul Mourning
  • Payal Nanavati
  • Lidia Niecko-Najjum
  • Rachael Padgett
  • Preston Pugh
  • Joe Records
  • Lauren R. Nunez
  • Sarah Rippy
  • Peter Roan
  • Kristof Roox
  • Todd Rosenberg
  • April Nelson Ross
  • Barbara H. Ryland
  • RP Sagner
  • Michael Shaheen
  • Roma Sharma
  • Tara Singh
  • Eric Su
  • Jeane A. Thomas
  • William Tucker
  • Michael G. Van Arsdall
  • Frederik Van Remoortel
  • Wietse Vanpoucke
  • Matthew Vicinanzo
  • Janet Walker
  • Maggie Weschler
  • Savanna Williams
  • Evan D. Wolff
  • Nathanial J. Wood

Stay Connected

RSS Twitter LinkedIn Georgetown Law Health Law Research Guide HealthAffairs Journal on Policy & Research HHS-OIG Health Care Fraud Prevention & Enforcement Action Team Kaiser Family Foundation Kaiser Health News Crowell & Moring’s Health Care Reform Law & Regulatory Resources Archive Data Law Insights Government Contracts Legal Forum Retail & Consumer Products Law Observer Trade Secrets Trends International Trade Law C&M Restructuring Matters State AG Blog

Subscribe to this blog

Topics

  • Administrative Law
  • Advertising
  • Antitrust
  • COVID-19
  • Crowell Health Solutions
  • Digital Health
  • Digital Transformation
  • Drug Pricing
  • EHR
  • Employee Benefits
  • ERISA
  • Events
  • Exchanges
  • False Claims Act
  • FDA
  • Federal Employees Health Benefits Program (FEHB)
  • Fraud, Waste & Abuse
  • FTC
  • Government Contracts
  • Health Care Reform & ACA
  • Health IT
  • HIPAA & Privacy
  • Litigation
  • Long Term Care
  • Managed Care Lawsuit Watch
  • Medicaid
  • Medical Loss Ratios
  • Medicare
  • MedTech
  • Mental Health Parity
  • Podcast
  • Reproductive Health Care
  • Tax
  • Telehealth
  • Uncategorized

Archives

Recent Updates

  • FTC Enforcement Against Sharing Consumer Health Information Continues
  • FTC Imposes $1.5 Million Civil Penalty in First-of-Its-Kind Health Breach Notification Rule Enforcement Action
  • 340B Contract Pharmacy Limits: The Conflict Continues
  • Hospital at Home Programs Extended, But Final Push Is Needed
  • President Biden Signs End-of-Year Legislation Including Telehealth, Medicare & Medicaid, Mental Health, Pandemic Preparedness, and Other Health Care Provisions

Health Law

RSS Twitter LinkedIn
Crowell & Moring LLP logo
Privacy PolicyDisclaimer

About C&M Health Law

Crowell & Moring’s C&M Health Law blog is committed to providing real-time analysis and commentary on the latest developments in health care law and policy. Our attorney authors are part of a diverse and growing practice from coast to coast. We understand that health care organizations need legal representation that cuts directly to the heart of any issue, whether in litigation, government investigations, regulatory compliance, or business collaborations and acquisitions. Our lawyers have deep experience in health care antitrust, managed care, fraud and abuse (including Stark, anti-kickback and False Claims Act matters), and privacy litigation, among other key regulatory areas. For more on Crowell & Moring’s health care practice …

Read More...
Copyright © 2023, Crowell & Moring LLP. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo